HI!
Hi am coco and you I m new here and I hope I can find what am looking for on here I want a man to explore me mentally and sexually can host and travel
Turn casual moments into unforgettable dates – choose the best casual dating site!
Real Women Unsurpassed Сasual Dating
most popular hookup app near san bernardino ca
Casual dating typically involves getting to know someone on a deeper level and potentially leading to a more serious relationship, while hooking up is usually more about physical intimacy without the commitment. When deciding between the two, it's important to communicate openly with partners about intentions, respect each other's boundaries, and prioritize consent to ensure a positive and fulfilling experience for all parties involved.
dfhdfhdfhfdhj544589dfjdfj
most popular hookup app near san bernardino ca
-
Phillippauth
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Thu Mar 21, 2024 11:24 pm
Return to “General discussions”
Jump to
- Info
- ↳ Official EURAD website
- ↳ EURAD School website
- ↳ Download EURAD Roadmap
- EURAD School of Radioactive Waste Management
- ↳ Courses & Events
- ↳ Mobility actions
- ↳ PhD students
- ↳ Publications
- EURAD Roadmap
- ↳ Theme 1: Managing implementation and oversight of a radioactive waste management programme
- ↳ 1.1 Programme Planning
- ↳ 1.1.1 National RWM policy
- ↳ 1.1.2 Timetable for decision making
- ↳ 1.1.3 Public information and participation
- ↳ 1.1.4 Safety, security, use of resources
- ↳ 1.1.5 Open or closed cycle, contribution to national energy mix, etc.
- ↳ 1.2 Programme Organization
- ↳ 1.2.1 Licensing framework
- ↳ 1.2.2 Licensing criteria
- ↳ 1.2.3 Allocate responsibilities
- ↳ 1.2.4 Waste management system
- ↳ 1.2.5 RD&D strategy
- ↳ 1.3 Programme Resources
- ↳ 1.4 National Inventory
- ↳ 1.4.1 National radioactive waste inventory
- ↳ 1.5 Management Solutions
- ↳ 1.5.1 Identify and evaluate potentially available concepts and technical solutions for spent fuel and RWM, taking account of national or local conditions, such as available predisposal and storage options, geological environments
- ↳ 1.5.2 Perform iterative evaluation of options at each stage of programme development taking account of international technological advances
- ↳ Theme 2: Radioactive waste characterization, processing and storage, and source term understanding for disposal
- ↳ 2.1 Planning
- ↳ 2.1.1 Inventory
- ↳ 2.1.2 Waste Acceptance Criteria
- ↳ 2.1.3 Technology selection
- ↳ 2.1.4 Waste hierarchy
- ↳ 2.2 Implementation
- ↳ 2.2.1 Characterisation
- ↳ 2.2.2 Treatment processing
- ↳ 2.2.3 Conditioning
- ↳ 2.2.4 Storage
- ↳ 2.2.5 Transport
- ↳ 2.3 Operations
- ↳ 2.3.1 Quality & Management systems
- ↳ 2.3.2 Optimisation
- ↳ 2.3.3 Secondary Waste Management
- ↳ Theme 3: Engineered Barrier System properties, function and long-term performance
- ↳ 3.1 Wasteform
- ↳ 3.1.1 Spent Nuclear Fuel
- ↳ 3.1.2 High level waste
- ↳ 3.1.3 Cemented LL-ILW
- ↳ 3.1.4 Other wasteforms
- ↳ 3.2 Waste packages for disposal
- ↳ 3.2.1 HLW and SF disposal containers
- ↳ 3.2.2 LL-ILW disposal containers
- ↳ 3.2.3 Other disposal containers
- ↳ 3.3 Buffers, backfills, plugs and seals
- ↳ 3.3.1 Buffer
- ↳ 3.3.2 Backfills
- ↳ 3.3.3 Plugs and seals
- ↳ 3.4 EBS system integration
- ↳ 3.4.1 EBS system
- ↳ 3.4.2 Co-disposal
- ↳ Theme 4: Geoscience to understand rock properties, radionuclide transport and long-term geological evolution
- ↳ 4.1 Site description
- ↳ 4.1.1 Site descriptive model
- ↳ 4.1.2 Aqueous transport and retention
- ↳ 4.1.3 Gas transport
- ↳ 4.1.4 Biosphere model
- ↳ 4.2 Long-term stability
- ↳ 4.2.1 Geological and tectonic evolution
- ↳ 4.2.2 Climate change
- ↳ 4.3 Perturbations
- ↳ 4.3.1 Perturbations
- ↳ Theme 5: Geological disposal facility design and the practicalities of construction, operations and closure
- ↳ 5.1 Design
- ↳ 5.1.1 Design specification
- ↳ 5.1.2 Design qualification
- ↳ 5.2 Constructability, demonstration and verification testing
- ↳ 5.2.1 Pilot-scale, full-scale testing and active commissioning
- ↳ 5.2.2 Optimisation
- ↳ 5.2.3 Manufacture, inspection and testing
- ↳ 5.2.4 Robotics
- ↳ 5.2.5 Virtual Reality / Digital Twin
- ↳ 5.3 Security and safeguards
- ↳ 5.3.1 Safeguards
- ↳ 5.3.2 Security and physical protection
- ↳ 5.4 Operational safety
- ↳ 5.4.1 Construction and non-radiological safety
- ↳ 5.4.2 Normal operations safety
- ↳ 5.4.3 Accident safety
- ↳ 5.4.4 Criticality safety
- ↳ 5.5 Monitoring and Retrievability
- ↳ 5.5.1 Baseline monitoring
- ↳ 5.5.2 Monitoring during construction and operations
- ↳ 5.5.3 Retrievability
- ↳ Theme 6: Siting and Licensing
- ↳ 6.1 Site selection process
- ↳ 6.1.1 Conceptual planning
- ↳ 6.1.2 Site evaluation
- ↳ 6.2 Detailed site investigation
- ↳ 6.2.1 Site characterization
- ↳ 6.2.2 Site confirmation
- ↳ 6.3 Licensing
- ↳ 6.3.1 Stakeholder involvement
- ↳ 6.3.2 Regulatory licensing
- ↳ Theme 7: Performance assessment, safety case development and safety analysis
- ↳ 7.1 Safety strategy
- ↳ 7.1.1 Safety requirements
- ↳ 7.1.2 Performance indicators
- ↳ 7.2 Integration of safety related information
- ↳ 7.2.1 Safety case production
- ↳ 7.2.2 Information, data and knowledge management
- ↳ 7.3 Safety Assessment and Tools
- ↳ 7.3.1 Performance assessment and system models
- ↳ 7.3.2 Treatment of uncertainty
- ↳ 7.3.3 Scenario development and FEP analysis
- General
- ↳ General discussions